Cases 11 - 20 of 234
Bolling-Carlisle v. Knight Adjustment Bureau Inc
as 4:2023cv00970
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bolling-Carlisle
Defendant:
Knight Adjustment Bureau Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bolling-Carlisle v. US Collections West Inc
as 4:2023cv00968
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bolling-Carlisle
Defendant:
US Collections West Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carlisle v. Univar Solutions Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04131
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Univar Solutions Inc., Christopher D. Pappas, David Jukes and others
Fannie Mae v. Amelia AID Propco LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Amelia AID Propco LLC, Ashley AID Propco LLC, Bentley AID Propco and others
Receiver:
Michael F. Flanagan
Fannie Mae et al v. Amelia Aid Propco LLC
as 2:2023mc00012
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Amelia Aid Propco LLC, Ashley Aid Propco LLC, Bentley Aid Propco LLC and others
Receiver:
Michael F Flanagan
Carlisle v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01956
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
Banfield Realty LLC v. Copeland et al
as 1:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Banfield Realty LLC
Defendant:
William E Copeland, Jack Copeland, Kevin Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land (CERCLA)
Carlisle v. Velodyne Lidar, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10720
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Velodyne Lidar, Inc., Virginia Boulet, Michael Dee and others
Carlisle v. LogicBio Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01418
Plaintiff:
Sam Carlisle
Defendant:
LogicBio Therapeutics, Inc., Richard Moscicki, Leon Chen and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
