Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Larry Davis v. Prosecutor Blake Badston, et al
as 19-2904
Defendant:
Prosecutor Kim Davis, Judge Gary Arnold, Officer Ryan Childers and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry David Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Deputy Prosecutor Daniel Odell Turner, Lt. Detective Brian Daniel, Clark County Sheriff's Office, Prosecutor Blake Badston and others
Clark v. Pie Pepper Bakery Company et al
as 1:2019cv00138
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Dr John Doe #1 and Pie Pepper Bakery Company
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alisha Pate, et al v. Rodney Tow, et al
as 18-20518
Appellant:
ALISHA PATE and YVONNE CLARK-THIGPEN
Appellee:
RODNEY D. TOW, Trustee and DANIEL CLARK, IV
Gabry v. State Farm FCU et al
as 1:2018cv03099
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gerald Gabry
Defendant:
State Farm FCU, Daniel Clark, Kesha Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Global House Buyer, LLC v. James Daniel Clark et al
as 2:2018cv03936
Defendant:
American Impact Energy I LLC, American Impact Energy LLC and James Daniel Clark
Plaintiff:
Global House Buyer, LLC
Clarke v. Sessions
as 18-532
Petitioner:
Santieno Daniel Clarke, AKA Santino Clarke
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Douglas Clark v. USDC-CALA
as 18-70095
:
In re: DOUGLAS DANIEL CLARK
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS DANIEL CLARK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
RON DAVIS, Warden
Global House Buyer, LLC v. James Daniel Clark et al
as 2:2017mc00107
Defendant:
American Impact Energy I LLC, American Impact Energy LLC and James Daniel Clark
Plaintiff:
Global House Buyer, LLC
Nathan Daniel Clark v. Tom Roy
as 12-1601
Petitioner:
Nathan Daniel Clark
Respondent:
Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections
Clark v. Blue Valley Unified School District No. 229
as 2:2010cv02691
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clark
Defendant:
Blue Valley Unified School District No. 229
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
