Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al
as 3:2020cv05630
Plaintiff:
Hoopa Valley Tribe
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Not Classified By Court:
Non-Party San Luis Water District, Non-Party Westlands Water District and Non-Party Panoche Water District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Backcountry Against Dumps et al v. Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 2:2020cv01380
Defendant:
Department of the Interior, David Bernhardt, Darryl LaCounte and others
Plaintiff:
Backcountry Against Dumps, Donna Tisdale and Joe E. Tisdale
Intervenor Defendant:
Terra-Gen Development Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Backcountry Against Dumps et al v. Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 2:2020at00677
Defendant:
Department of the Interior, David Bernhardt, Darryl LaCounte and others
Plaintiff:
Backcountry Against Dumps, Donna Tisdale and Joe E. Tisdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Reclamation, et al.
as 1:2020cv00706
Plaintiff:
Planning and Conservation League, Center for Biological Diversity and Restore The Delta
Defendant:
David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation and United States Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
AquAlliance et al v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation et al
as 2:2020cv00959
Plaintiff:
South Delta Water Agency, California Water Impact Network, Central Delta Water Agency and others
Defendant:
David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
AquAlliance et al v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation et al
as 2:2020at00462
Plaintiff:
South Delta Water Agency, California Water Impact Network, Central Delta Water Agency and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Interior, David Bernhardt, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 4:2020cv03037
Defendant:
David Bernhardt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Aurelia Skipwith
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity and Environmental Protection Information Center
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al. v. Ross, et al.
as 1:2020cv00431
Intervenor:
Provident Irrigation District, State Water Contractors, Maxwell Irrigation District and others
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wilbur Ross, Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff:
Golden State Salmon Association, Bay.Org, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and others
Petitioner:
People of the State of California, California Natural Resources Agency and California Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor Defendant:
Oakdale Irrigation District, Knights Landing Investors, LLC, South San Joaquin Irrigation District and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
California Natural Resources Agency, et al. v. Ross, et al.
as 1:2020cv00426
Plaintiff:
State of California by and through California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, California Environmental Protection Agency and California Natural Resources Agency
Intervenor:
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, State Water Contractors, Westlands Water District and others
Defendant:
David Bernhardt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Sacramento River Intervenors, Oji Brothers Farm, Inc., Sutter Mutual Water Company and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2020cv01563
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
Thomas B. Modly, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. House of Representatives
Petitioner:
Stephen P. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
