Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Anderson v. Earthlink, Inc.
as 8:2013cv01001
Plaintiff: Clifford Anderson
Defendant: Earthlink, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Gangi
as 13-1271
Plaintiff - Appellee: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Plaintiff: PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
ADJESS MOTORS LLC v. EARTHLINK, INC. et al
as 3:2013cv01013
Plaintiff: ADJESS MOTORS LLC
Defendant: EARTHLINK, INC. and MONMOUTH INTERNET CORPORATION
Cross_claimant: MONMOUTH INTERNET CORPORATION
Cross_defendant: EARTHLINK, INC.
Counter_claimant: MONMOUTH INTERNET CORPORATION
Counter_defendant: ADJESS MOTORS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Garcia v. Earthlink, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01129
Plaintiff: Monica Garcia
Defendant: Earthlink, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1327
Plaintiff - Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party - Appellee: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1102
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Interested Party - Interested Party: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Intervenor: JOSHUA JUSTICE-POPE
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 12-1102
Plaintiff / Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant / Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Defendant / Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver, AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC and others
USA v. The Account identified as "robinscloset@earthlink.net maintained by Earthlink Inc.
as 2:2010mj01803
Defendant: The Account identified as "robinscloset@earthlink.net maintained by Earthlink Inc. (1)
Plaintiff: USA
The Account identified as "robinscloset@earthlink.net maintained by Earthlink Inc.
as 2:2010mj01803
Defendant: The Account identified as "robinscloset@earthlink.net maintained by Earthlink Inc. (1)
Plaintiff: USA
UNITED ACCESS V EARTHLINK We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1251
Plaintiff-Appellant: Broadband Technology Innovations, LLC, Inline Connection Corporation, Pie Squared, LLC and others
Broadband Technology Innovations, LLC: , , and others
Defendant/Cross Appellant: EarthLink, Inc., EarthLink, Inc., EarthLink, Inc. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?