Cases 11 - 20 of 21
LOPEZ v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
EDWIN LOPEZ
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Edwin Lopez Camaro v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-73321
Petitioner:
EDWIN LOPEZ CAMARO, AKA Edwin Concepcion Lopez, AKA Julio Amilcar Mendez Linares
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
United States of America v. Tolentino
as 14-2639
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Manuel Peguero-Franco, AKA Manny and Edwin Lopez Diaz, AKA Doctor
Defendant - Appellant:
Juan Tolentino, AKA Chamacho, AKA Ismael
United States of America v. Tolentino (Lopez Diaz)
as 14-1680
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juan Tolentino, AKA Chamacho, AKA Ismael and Manuel Peguero-Franco, AKA Manny
Defendant - Appellant:
Edwin Lopez Diaz, AKA Doctor
Edwin Lopez Camaro v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71979
Petitioner:
EDWIN LOPEZ CAMARO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Edwin Lopez-Cruz v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-72463
Petitioner:
EDWIN LOPEZ-CRUZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
DANDREA PRODUCE, INC. v. LATIN PRODUCE CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv06043
Plaintiff:
DANDREA PRODUCE, INC.
Defendant:
LATIN PRODUCE CORP., MUKESH PATEL and EDWIN LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Munoz-Polanco v. Ensley et al
as 1:2009cv02614
Plaintiff:
Victor Munoz-Polanco
Defendant:
Sean D. Ensley, M. Whigham, Wiley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
US v. Pereira
as 09-1087
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS MANUEL PEREIRA, a/k/a Angel Vivas, a/k/a Jose Ramon Cana, a/k/a Manolo, a/k/a Edwin Lopez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
