Cases 11 - 20 of 1,069
Medina-Ventura, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1651
Petitioner:
DORA ISABEL MEDINA-VENTURA and MIA KIMBERLY ESTRADA-MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jesus Eric Carasco v. E. Martin Estrada et al
as 8:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Jesus Eric Carasco
Defendant:
E. Martin Estrada and United States
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Estrada da Vida LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Estrada da Vida LLC doing business as The Cork House Wine Bar doing business as The Cork House and Xavier D. Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lopez-Ordonez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1263
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO LOPEZ-ORDONEZ, JULIA ALICIA SAY-ESTRADA, DASHA GISSEL LOPEZ-SAY and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Garcia-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-767
Petitioner:
JERRY JONATHAN GARCIA-LOPEZ, ADARIS YAMILETH ESTRADA DARRAYO and MAXWELL SNEIJDER GARCIA ESTRADA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Estrada-Hurtado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-702
Petitioner:
EDWIN TOMAS ESTRADA-HURTADO, DELMY ARELY TORRES-DE ESTRADA, CAMILA ALEXANDRA ESTRADA-TORRES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Estrada-Estrada, et al. v. Garland
as 24-274
Petitioner:
MEYBELIN YANIRA ESTRADA-ESTRADA and HENRY ABRAHAM SANCHEZ-ESTRADA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Erica Manuel-Soto, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1089
Petitioner:
ERICA NOHEMI MANUEL-SOTO, ELFEGO ISMAEL ESTRADA-SIMON, D. E. E.-M. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Martinez Estrada v. Garland
as 24-172
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ ESTRADA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
