Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,025
Sheppard v. Sage Cove, LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv11418
Defendant: Tapper and Fratto, LLC., Sage Cove, LLC., District Court of Baltimore County and others
Plaintiff: Allen Fitzgerald Sheppard, Jr.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Pressly v. US
as 24-1823
Plaintiff: ROBERT A. PRESSLY, 8599 CAR LOT, LLC, DIANE M. AKERS and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Dinsmore v. Cohbar, Inc et al
as 6:2024cv00857
Plaintiff: Jacob R Dinsmore
Defendant: Cohbar, Inc, David Greenwood, Albion Fitzgerald and others
Anthony Marano Company et al v. Dom's Market, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03472
Plaintiff: Anthony Marano Company and Market Cuts, LLC
Defendant: Dom's Market, LLC doing business as Dom's Kitchen & Market, Dom's Market Holdco, Inc., Foxtrot Retail, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
US v. Carpenter
as 24-1389
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: DANIEL E. CARPENTER
Interested Party: BRIAN FITZGERALD, Estate of Byron Darling and ESTATE OF BYRON DARLING
Fitzgerald v. Five9, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02203
Plaintiff: Travis Fitzgerald
Defendant: Five9, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 2011 - Veteran's Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff: LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
United States of America v. Moore
as 24-1937
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BERRYON FITZGERALD MOORE, III
Duke v. Josefowicz
as 24-1785
Petitioner: BRENT FITZGERALD DUKE
Respondent: CHRISTOPHER JOSEFOWICZ
Duke v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-1524
Petitioner: BRENT FITZGERALD DUKE
Respondent: RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?