Cases 11 - 20 of 3,604
White et al v. County of Rensselaer et al
as NYN/1:24-CV-00280
Plaintiff:
White, Robert White, Stacey Bishop and others
Defendant:
County of Rensselaer and Mark Wojcik
Franklin Real Estate, L.P. v. F.H.M. Investments
as 5:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Franklin Real Estate, L.P. a Delaware Limited Partnership doing business as Franklin Family Partnership, L.P.
Defendant:
F.H.M. Investments, Orval L. Hill, Sylvia Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Richardson, III v. Third Coast Auto Group, LP
as 1:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Franklin Richardson, III
Defendant:
Third Coast Auto Group, LP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Camus, et al. v. Sharp Healthcare
as 24-2520
Plaintiff:
HANNAH COUSIN, DEANNA FRANKLIN-PITTMAN, LINDA CAMUS and others
Defendant:
SHARP HEALTHCARE
Cousin, et al. v. Sharp Healthcare
as 24-2511
Plaintiff:
HANNAH COUSIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LINDA CAMUS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, DEANNA FRANKLIN-PITTMAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
SHARP HEALTHCARE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jeton Lita/Simon Bolivar Express Trust v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2024cv02714
Plaintiff:
Jeton Lita/Simon Bolivar Express Trust
Defendant:
Brad C. Calhoun, Teachers Federal Credit Union, Timothy M. Southerton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Bruce Franklin
as 24-1764
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bruce Franklin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
