Cases 11 - 19 of 19
In the Matter of James Louis Parks Jr. - #202571
as 3:2017mc80155
Respondent:
James Louis Parks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Chopp v. Genworth Financial, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Esther Chopp
Defendant:
Genworth Financial, Inc. , William H. Bolinder , G. Kent Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ratliff v. Genworth Financial, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
David Ratliff, II
Defendant:
Genworth Financial, Inc., William H. Bolinder, G. Kent Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chopp v. Genworth Financial, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
Esther Chopp
Defendant:
Genworth Financial, Inc. , William H. Bolinder , G. Kent Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
James v. Genworth Financial, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
Brian James
Defendant:
Genworth Financial, Inc., Thomas J. McInerney, James S. Riepe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rice v. Genworth Financial Incorporated et al
as 3:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rice
Defendant:
Genworth Financial Incorporated , Thomas J. McInerney , James S. Riepe and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
David Ratliff, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Park
as 6:2009cv01137
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission and Securities & Exchange Commission
Defendant:
James H. Park
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
James Arthur Parks v. A-bex Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-73843
Defendant:
A-bex Corporation
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Parks
Anderson et al v. U.S. Army Corps Engineers
as 4:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Anderson, Jo Anderson, William Scott Armstrong and others
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Tulsa District and Grayson County Central Appraisal District
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
