Cases 11 - 20 of 24
John Rogers, et al v. CIR
as 15-3678
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD ROGERS and FRANCES L. ROGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Rogers v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv04989
Plaintiff:
John E. Rogers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Jefferson County, Alabama v. Andrew Bennett, et al
as 14-90024
Petitioner:
JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA
Respondent:
ANDREW BENNETT, Jefferson County Tax Assessor, Bessemer Division, RODERICK V. ROYAL, Former Birmingham City Council President, MARY MOORE, Alabama State Legislator and others
:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BOND LAWYERS and SECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION
John Rogers, et al v. CIR
as 12-2686
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN E. ROGERS and FRANCES L. ROGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
John Rogers, et al v. CIR
as 12-2652
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN E. ROGERS and FRANCES L. ROGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Brannon et al v. BP America Production Company
as 2:2012cv00964
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Brannon , Russell D. Brannon , Duoc Chau and others
Defendant:
BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333
Brannon et al v. BP America Production Company
as 4:2011cv04055
Plaintiff:
Kevin D Brannon , Russell D Brannon , Duoc Chau and others
Defendant:
BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333
Perales v. Obama et al
as 3:2011cv00182
Defendant:
Richard Bruce Cheney, Peter Hoekstra, Christopher Samuel Bond and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. John Roger
as 11-1784
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
John Travis Rogers
Rogers v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
as 2:2010cv02339
Plaintiff:
John P. Rogers
Defendant:
NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
