Cases 11 - 20 of 166
Thomas v. United States, et al
as 21-3067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERENCE L. THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, A. BONCHER, Warden and (FNU) ARPANO, Unit Manager
US v. Treyton Thomas
as 21-6585
Defendant / Appellant:
TREYTON LEE THOMAS, f/k/a Tracy Lee Thomas, a/k/a Trayton Thomas, a/k/a T. L. Thomas, a/k/a Lee Thomas, a/k/a Erick Stratton
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Manuel Thomas, Jr.In re: Manuel Thomas, Jr.
as 21-10950
Petitioner:
In re: MANUEL L. THOMAS, JR.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Thomas v. Consumer Cellular Inc
as 1:2020cv00251
Plaintiff:
George L Thomas
Defendant:
Consumer Cellular Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Floyd Chodosh, et al v. John Saunders, et al
as 20-56252
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLEN L. THOMAS, CARY WOOD, 3187 REDHILL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD PETERSON, RODGER KANE, Jr., OLE HAUGEN and others
Curtis Thomas v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 20-14307
Petitioner / Appellant:
CURTIS L. THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
United States v. Thomas
as 20-3224
Defendant / Appellant:
TERENCE L. THOMAS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nathaniel Brown v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 20-14015
Defendant / Appellee:
MELISSA NELSON, State Attorney for the Fourth Judicial Circuit Court Florida, BRADFORD L. THOMAS, Cheif Judge, 1st DCA Florida, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL J. BROWN, a.k.a. Nathaniel J. Brown
Thomas v. Wilkie
as 21-1004
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant:
DERREL L. THOMAS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05751
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
