Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Mohamed Gordon v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60763
Petitioner:
MOHAMED LAMIN LESLIE A. GORDON, also known as Mohamed Gordon
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sae Han Sheet Co., Ltd. v. Eastman Performance Films, LLC
as 19-2080
Defendant:
2010 ACQUISITION CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, CPFILMS INC., a Delaware Corporation, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
EASTMAN PERFORMANCE FILMS, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAE HAN SHEET CO., LTD.
Abraham Lamin v. United States
as 19-1682
Petitioner:
Abraham Maada Lamin
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
US v. Lamine Camara
as 17-4602
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LAMINE CAMARA
Lamin Jatta v. Jefferson Sessions III
as 17-1659
Petitioner:
LAMIN Y. JATTA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Baker v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plast
as 17-493
Plaintiff:
Lisa Tift, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marilyn Peckham, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Bryan Schrom, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner:
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. and Honeywell International Inc., FKA Allied-Signal Inc., FKA AlliedSignal Laminate Systems, Inc.
Respondent:
Silvia Potter, individually and as parent and natural guardian of K.P., infant, Michele Baker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Angela Corbett, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Jobe v. Session
as 17-284
Petitioner:
Momodoulamin Jobe, AKA Momodou Lamin Jobe, AKA Momodou Jobe
Respondent:
Sally Q. Yates, Acting United States Attorney General
United States v. Abraham Lamin
as 15-3429
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Abraham Maada Lamin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
