Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,237
Griffin v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc et al
as 1:2023cv05560
Petitioner: Nikita J. Griffin
Respondent: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Application to Vacate Arbitration Award
Tera Group, Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc.
as 24-135
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERA GROUP, INC., TERA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and TERAEXCHANGE, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: CITIGROUP, INC., CITIBANK, N.A., CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. and others
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED and others
Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago v. Bank of America Corporation
as 24-81
Petitioner: PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT FUND OF CHICAGO, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
Respondent: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED and others
White v. Anywhere Real Estate Inc., et al.
as 23-4378
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICHOLAS PHIPPS WHITE, a California Resident
Defendant / Appellee: ANYWHERE REAL ESTATE INC., parent company of West Coast Escrow Company a domestic corporation, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. and others
Roberts v. Bloom Energy Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv02935
Plaintiff: Elissa M. Roberts, James Everett Hunt, Juan Rodriguez and others
Defendant: Scott Sandell, Mary A. Ayotte, Eddy Zervigon and others
Petitioner: Cecil W. Forsberg and Ronald M. Kruse
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01608
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff: The City of Philadelphia, City of Philadelphia and San Diego Association of Governments
Consolidated Defendant: Fifth Third Securities, Inc., BMO Financial Corp., BMO Financial Group and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Bank of America Corporation v. US
as 23-251
Petitioner: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, f/k/a NationsBank, f/k/a BankAmerica Corporation, a/k/a FleetBoston Financial Corporation, f/k/a BankBoston Corporation, f/k/a Summit Bancorp, f/k/a MBNA Corporation, f/k/a Merrill Lynch & Company, Incorporated
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv06221
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Strategic Securities Lending Corp., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System, Orange County Employees Retirement System, Sonoma County Employees' Retirement Association and others
Interested Party: Schonfeld Strategic Advisors LLC and Two Sigma Investments, LP
Petitioner: SL-X IP S.A.R.L., SL-x Trading Europe Ltd., SL-x Technology UK Ltd. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Deutsche Bank AG and Joseph Santoro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
In re: NIO, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 23-1190
Petitioner: NIO Inc., Bin Li, Louis T. Hsieh and others
Respondent: Jonathan Tan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Eva Huang
Gold v. US Bancorp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01342
Plaintiff: Michelle Gold, The Gold Family Trust, Star Martinez and others
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, RBS Acceptance Inc., RBS Financial Prodcuts Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?