Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Gould, et al v. Morgan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2202
Amicus Curiae: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: COMMONWEALTH SECOND AMENDMENT, INC., CHRISTOPHER HART, SARAH ZESCH and others
Defendant / Appellee: DANIEL C. O'LEARY, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the Brookline Police Department, WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Boston Police Department, MARK MORGAN, Acting Chief of the Brookline Police Department and others
Petitioner: ALAN B. MORRISON and JACK RAKOVE
Plaintiff: IRWIN CRUZ and MARKUS VALLASTER
Defendant: DAVID A. PROVENCHER, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the New Bedford Police Department
Jane Doe (1), et al v. Backpage.com, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1724
Plaintiff - Appellant: JANE DOE (1), JANE DOE (2), JANE DOE (3) and others
Defendant - Appellee: BACKPAGE.COM, LLC, CAMARILLO HOLDINGS, LLC, f/k/a Village Voice Media Holding, LLC and NEW TIMES MEDIA, LLC
Interested Party: MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION and others
Consumer Financial Protection, et al v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 14-5265
Plaintiff - Appellee: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, State of Alabama, Alabama Attorney General's Office, State of Alaska, Alaska Attorney General's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee: OCWEN Financial Corporation and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
Movant - Appellant: Christopher Stoller
Massachusetts Association of Private Career Schools v. Coakley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv13706
Plaintiff: Massachusetts Association of Private Career Schools
Defendant: Martha Coakley and The Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Biton v. Aventura
as 13-1167
Plaintiff - Appellant: Danielle Biton, AKA Bitton, AKA Marcelle Bitton, AKA Charlene Biton, AKA Kristy Alexis, AKA Tigress Redford, AKA Crystal & Saphyre
Defendant - Appellee: Aventura, a municipal Corporation, Florida Mayor Gottlieb, Marymount Manhattan College and others
Biton v. Aventura et al
as 1:2012cv05426
Defendant: ACLU, Aaronson Rapport Feinstein Deutch, Ann Friedfertig and others
Plaintiff: Danielle Biton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Prall
as 12-1959
Petitioner: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: MA SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT, OFFICE OF THE BAR COUNSEL, CITY OF BOSTON, Law Department and others
In Re: Murray
as 12-1171
Petitioner: JAMES M. MURRAY, a/k/a James Hines
Respondent: B.A. BLEDSOE, MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Litif, et al v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2255
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANNA M. LITIF, individually, and in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Louis R. Litif, LUANNE LITIF, LEE LITIF and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES
Defendant: JOHN M. MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Interested Party: PETER GELZINIS, SUFFOLK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS FOR THE SUFFOLK, NORFOLK, AND MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Plaintiff: JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis and MARION HUSSEY, in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Deborah Hussey
Davis, et al v. US
as 11-2256
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis and ROBERT P. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES
Defendant: H. PAUL RICO, JOHN M. MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
Interested Party: DISTRICT ATTORNEYS FOR THE SUFFOLK, NORFOLK, AND MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS OF MASSACHUSETTS and MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff: OLGA DAVIS, in her capacity as administratrix of the Estate of Debra Davis

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?