Cases 11 - 20 of 105
Misty Brown v. Megan Brennan
as 21-16154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MISTY DANIELLE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Post Master General
Sherille Harris v. Megan Brennan
as 21-1936
Defendant / Appellee:
Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General USPS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sherille Harris
Cole v. Brennan
as 21-5026
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY L. COLE
Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al
as 21-55166
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, PAUL M. NAKASONE, Department of Defense, National Security Agency, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMAD JAMALEDDIN ALJINDI
Rosalind Clayton v. Louis DeJoy, et al
as 21-1152
Defendant / Appellee:
American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO, Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General United States Postal Service and Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General United States Postal Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rosalind A. Clayton
Rosalind Clayton v. Louis DeJoy, et al
as 21-1153
Defendant / Appellee:
American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO, Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General United States Postal Service and Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General United States Postal Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rosalind A. Clayton
Hawthorne v. Brennan
as 1:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan
Plaintiff:
Regina Hawthorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Mendell v. Brennan
as 21-4002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NGOC RON MENDELL
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN
Tanya Jones v. Megan Brennan
as 20-2190
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TANYA JONES, a/k/a Tanya Lorraine Jones
Jesse Meyer v. Megan Brennan
as 20-16833
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE R. MEYER
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
