Cases 11 - 20 of 9,246
Bornstein et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04425
Plaintiff:
Galyna Bornstein and Jeffrey Bornstein
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
US v. Mulero-Vargas
as 24-1503
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JOSE MULERO-VARGAS, t/n Jose Angel Mulero-Vargas
Rolon v. City of New York
as 24-1439
Plaintiff:
KAYLA ROLON, COREY GILZEAN, MICHAEL HERNANDEZ and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Mayor BILL DE BLASIO and others
Intervenor:
POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC.
Moller Maher Saman et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Moller Maher Saman, Jenan Mkhael Kabbas and Carla Moller Maher N. Saman
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immgiration Services, Los Angeles Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Maribel Cazares Guerrero v. Merrick Garland et al
as 2:2024cv04369
Plaintiff:
MARIBEL CAZARES GUERRERO
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, Alexandro N Mayorkas, Director UR M JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
TruConnect Communication, Inc. v. Peterson
as 24-3297
Plaintiff:
TRUCONNECT COMMUNICATION, INC., a California corporation
Defendant:
RACHEL PETERSON, n her official capacity as Executive Director of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California and in her individual capacity
United States of America v. Rezene
as 24-3255
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SAMUEL N. REZENE
Patel et al v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2024cv04181
Plaintiff:
Sangeeta Y Patel and yogeshkumar k patel
Defendant:
District Director UR M JADDOU, Director Laura B. Zuchowski and Alejandro N Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
