Cases 11 - 20 of 669
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-427
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
Captain TOLMIE, BLEKIS, PELLITERI and others
Orozco v. Norton, et al.
as 24-798
Plaintiff:
MARCUS KELO OROZCO
Defendant:
BENNETTE NORTON, Dr., M.D., "Ben", JOHN MYRICK, TROY BOWSER and others
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant / Appellee:
Captain TOLMIE, BLEKIS, PELLITERI and others
Defendant:
ROLLIN COOK, WILLIAM MULLIGAN, AMONDA HANNAH and others
United States of America v. Norton
as 24-132
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGELINA LARAE NORTON
Norton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 23-8068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM CHARLES NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Petteway v. Connecticut Department of Corrections
as 23-8047
Plaintiff:
TAVERAS, Garner CI, CHRISTOPHER DEVEAU, ISAIAH BONEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER Q. PETTEWAY
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Which includes, but may not be limited to The Conn State Department Public Health; Securs TECH. Inc; Unity Products, LLC; The United States Post Office Post Master Gomaps, CRAIG WASHINGTON, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, ANGEL QUIROS, Commissioner of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity and others
United States v. Darnell Norton
as 23-3686
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Darnell Michael Norton, also known as Dino
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
