Cases 11 - 20 of 1,061
Ortega v. Cally Consulting, PLLC
as 5:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Defendant:
Cally Consulting, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ortega v. Fields et al
as 5:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Defendant:
Daniel Gilbert Fields and Eric Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
USA v. Ortega-Martinez
as 24-40258
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gregorio Ortega-Martinez
Solis, et al. v. T-Mobile US, Inc., et al.
as 24-2412
Plaintiff:
JANNET SOLIS, MICHAEL ORTEGA, ADVANCED WEIGHT LOSS SURGICAL ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
T-MOBILE US, INC. and UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fields v. Foss, et al.
as 24-2377
Plaintiff:
DEVONTE SHAWN DUPREE FIELDS
Defendant:
C. CALDERON, S. ALVAREZ, D. MAGANA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
Portillo-Tellez v. Garland
as 24-967
Petitioner:
DAYSI YULESI PORTILLO-TELLEZ, OSMAN ANTONIO ORTEGA-PORTILLO and YORDANY RUBEN PORTILLO-TELLEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
v. Naturalization Ceremony 04/23/2024
as 3:2024mc80088
Not Yet Classified:
Adriana Denisse Aguirre, Ali Marzoughi, Jonathan Galvez and others
Ortega v. JKB FINANCIAL
as 5:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Mark Ortega
Defendant:
JKB FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
