Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Waterford Township Police & Fire Retirement System v. Regional Management Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv03876
Plaintiff:
Waterford Township Police & Fire Retirement System
Defendant:
Regional Management Corp. , Palladium Equity Partners III, L.P. , Palladium Equity Partners III, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
USA v. Kevin Quattlebaum
as 13-3026
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Kevin Quattlebaum
United States of America v. Russell (Quattlebaum)
as 13-1030
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brandy Russell, AKA Bam, AKA B Russ, Tyrone King, AKA Ty, James Pendleton, AKA Peanut, AKA 1:00-CR-11080-4 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kareem Quattlebaum, AKA Keezo
US v. Emmett Quattlebaum
as 12-6240
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EMMETT QUATTLEBAUM
NAILS v. QUATTLEBAUM et al
as 1:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant:
KENNETH QUATTLEBAUM, DAVID PATE, WILLIAM LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAILS v. QUATTLEBAUM, et al.
as 2:2010cv02743
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
KENNETH QUATTLEBAUM, DAVID PATE, WILLIAM LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAILS v. QUATTLEBAUM, et al.
as 1:2010cv01584
Plaintiff:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant:
KENNETH QUATTLEBAUM, DAVID PATE, WILLIAM LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Randy Quattlebaum
as 08-7476
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RANDY LINDIAL QUATTLEBAUM
US v. Furman Quattlebaum
as 08-4777
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FURMAN BENJAMIN QUATTLEBAUM
Party-in-Interest - None:
RANDY MARTIN, LUTHER BRYAN, ALISIA H. AKBAR and others
USA v. Kevin Quattlebaum
as 08-3064
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Kevin Quattlebaum
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
