Cases 11 - 20 of 56
S.S. v. Board of Education of Harford
as 20-2260
Plaintiff / Appellee:
M.S., S.S., a minor child, by and through her Parents and next friends, T.S. and M.S. and T.S.
Defendant / Appellant:
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HARFORD COUNTY and SEAN BULSON, Superintendent, officially
G. S., et al v. Penn Trafford School District, et al
as 20-3281
Defendant / Appellee:
PENN TRAFFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT, GREGORY CAPOCCIONI, SCOTT INGLESE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
G. S., as an individual and mother and natural giardian of SS.,a minor and S.S., a minor
Andrew Flores, et al v. USDC-CASD
as 20-71813
Not Classified By Court:
LAWRENCE GERACI, an individual, AKA Larry, REBECCA BERRY, an individual, JAMES BARTELL, an individual, AKA Jim and others
Petitioner:
ANDREW FLORES, an individual, JANE DOE, an individual and AMY SHERLOCK, on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor children, T.S. and S.S
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Family Civil Liberties Union, et al v. New Jersey Department of Child, et al
as 20-1455
Defendant / Appellee:
SOARING HEIGHTS CHARTER SCHOOL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Division of Child Protection & Permanency, GURBIR S. GREWAL, In his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FAMILY CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, SURENDER MALHAN, for himself and as parent of E.M, and V.M, ZIA SHAIKH, for himself and as parent of M.S., S.S., and H.S. and others
Defendant:
PEACEFUL HEALING LLC, LISA VON PIER, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Chico Moss, et al v. American Private Equity, LLC, et al
as 19-14777
Defendant / Appellant:
FREDDY A. RUSSIAN and AMERICAN PRIVATE EQUITY, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHICO S.S. MOSS and KI.M.ET LTDA
Leanne Walters, et al v. MI, et al
as 19-2012
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SARAH CHEESEMAN, individually and as next friend of her children A.C. and D.C., SHAYLA ROBINSON, individually and as next friend of her children C.R.1, C.R.2, and S.H., FLOYD BELL, individually and as next friend to his child M.B. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
HOWARD CROFT, DAUGHERTY JOHNSON, CITY OF FLINT, MI and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al
Leanne Walters, et al v. MI, et al
as 19-2000
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SARAH CHEESEMAN, individually and as next friend of her children A.C. and D.C., SHAYLA ROBINSON, individually and as next friend of her children C.R.1, C.R.2, and S.H., FLOYD BELL, individually and as next friend to his child M.B. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHEN BUSCH, BRADLEY WURFEL, PATRICK COOK and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al
Leanne Walters, et al v. MI, et al
as 19-2005
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SARAH CHEESEMAN, individually and as next friend of her children A.C. and D.C., SHAYLA ROBINSON, individually and as next friend of her children C.R.1, C.R.2, and S.H., FLOYD BELL, individually and as next friend to his child M.B. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM ROSENTHAL
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al
Leanne Walters, et al v. MI, et al
as 19-2008
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SARAH CHEESEMAN, individually and as next friend of her children A.C. and D.C., SHAYLA ROBINSON, individually and as next friend of her children C.R.1, C.R.2, and S.H., FLOYD BELL, individually and as next friend to his child M.B. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD DALE SNYDER, former Governor, GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor and ANDY DILLON, former State Treasurer
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al
Gary Thomas v. S.C. Dept. of Social Services
as 19-1630
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA AGGER, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, PORCHA MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
S.M.T., L.B. and S.S.
Defendant:
GAIL HENSON, PATIENCE JOHNSON, SUSAN ALFORD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY THOMAS and FERRIS HARVLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
