Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Seiko Epson Corporation, a Japan corporation et al v. Prinko Image Co. USA, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv04501
Plaintiff: Epson Portland Inc., Epson America, Inc. and Seiko Epson Corporation
Defendant: Prinko Image Co. USA, Inc.
Keranos, LLC v. Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013mc80108
Plaintiff: Keranos, LLC
Defendant: Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. , Seiko Epson Corporation, Epson America, Inc. and others
Gisele Rogers v. Epson America, Inc., et al
as 11-80256
Plaintiff - Petitioner: GISELE ROGERS, individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent: EPSON AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, EPSON ACCESSORIES, INC., a California corporation, SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation and others
T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv02591
Plaintiff: T-Mobile USA Inc
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 2:2011cv00664
Plaintiff: T-Mobile USA Inc
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
SEIKO EPSON V CORETRONIC CORP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1120
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee: Coretronic Corporation
Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee: Epson America, Inc. and Epson Research and Development, Inc.
Defendant-Appellee: Optoma Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant: Seiko Epson Corporation
Best Buy Co., Inc. et al v. AU Optronics Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv04572
Plaintiff: Best Buy Co., Inc. , Best Buy Purchasing LLC , Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. and others
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
AU Optronics Corporation, et al v. USDCSF, et al
as 10-71745
: In re: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Petitioner: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Respondent: USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant: EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Real Party In Interest: CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant: CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?