Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Nahas v. Shore Medical Center et al
as 1:2017cv06996
Plaintiff:
Frederick Nahas
Defendant:
Shore Medical Center, Steven Nachtigall, Jeffrey Gosin and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Unknown v Unknown
as 1:2017cv06988
Plaintiff:
Frederick Nahas and Medical Executive Committee
Defendant:
Shore Medical Center, Stephen P Nachtigall, Jeffrey Gosin and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
David Gabros v. Shore Medical Center, et al
as 16-3764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. GABROS, MD
Defendant - Appellee:
SHORE MEDICAL CENTER, LINWOOD CARE CENTER, STEVEN P. NACHTIGALL, MD and others
In Re: Hamilton, et al
as 16-1121
Petitioner:
DIANE HAMILTON, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated, CLAIRE KANE, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated and LYNNE P. CUNNINGHAM, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated
Respondent:
PARTNERS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC., PARTNERS COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE, INC., BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL and others
:
JAMES J. MONGAN, MD, DENNIS D. COLLING and YOUVILLE HOSPITAL & REHABILITATION CENTER, INC.
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS NURSES ASSOCIATION
Ogiemwonyi et al v. Cotter, M.D. et al
as 1:2014cv12329
Plaintiff:
Maureen Ogiemwonyi and Osagie Ogiemwonyi
Defendant:
Mark Collins, M.D. , North Shore Medical Center, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
GABROS v. SHORE MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 1:2014cv01864
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. GABROS, M.D.
Defendant:
SHORE MEDICAL CENTER, LINWOOD CARE CENTER, STEVEN P. NACHTIGALL, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
NAHAS v. SHORE MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 1:2013cv06537
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK NAHAS, M.D.
Defendant:
SHORE MEDICAL CENTER, STEVEN P. NACHTIGALL, JEFFREY GOSIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
