Cases 11 - 20 of 389
Boone v. Allison, et al.
as 23-3605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VELTON LAMONT BOONE
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden RON DAVIS, DANIEL SMITH and others
Levy et al v. McNamee et al
as 1:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
Elias Levy and Camerohn X. Withers
Defendant:
George C. McNamee, Gary K. Willis, Maureen O. Helmer and others
Nominal Defendant:
Plug Power, Inc.
Bhavsar et al. v. Marsh et al
as 1:2023cv09452
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar and Samhita Gera
Defendant:
Andrew Marsh, Paul B. Middleton, David Mindnich and others
Nominal Defendant:
Plug Power Inc.
Trappen v. Marsh et al
as 1:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
Peter Trappen
Defendant:
Andrew Marsh, Paul B. Middleton, David Mindnich and others
Nominal Defendant:
Plug Power Inc.
EVANS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
BETSY B. EVANS, DONALD R. EVANS, JR., ARDEN W. THORNTON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Huang v. Garland
as 23-6730
Petitioner:
SONG YING HUANG
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Bogies Restaurant Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Bogies Restaurant Inc. doing business as Bogie's - West Sports Bar & Grill and James K. Song
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized reception of cable service
Song v. Fish et al
as 5:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
YOUNG HEUP SONG
Defendant:
SCOTT FISH, JORDAN FISH, UP DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Hwang v. Lin
as 2:2023mc00230
Plaintiff:
Jie Chi Hwang
Defendant:
Song Hui Lin
Petitioner:
United States of America
Tiefei Song v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2023cv04099
Plaintiff:
Tiefei Song
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Rosemary Langley Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
