Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Novasano LLC et al v. Arctic Security OY et al
as 1:2020cv05892
Defendant:
Arctic Security OY, Synopsys, Inc., David Chartier and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Nordenberg, Novasano LLC, Novasano Health and Sciences, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2707
Synopsys, Inc. v. USDOL
as 20-16414
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SYNOPSYS, INC.
Synopsys, Inc., et al v. USDOL
as 20-16416
Plaintiff:
THE CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING and WILL EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Intervenor:
SYNOPSYS, INC.
Synopsys, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Labor
as 4:2020cv00693
Plaintiff:
Synopsys, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Digital Millennium Copyright Act to Copyright Agent, Zetta Hosting Solutions LLC
as 1:2018mc00043
Interested_party:
Synopsys, Inc.
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Subpoena to GitHub Inc.
as 1:2018mc00042
Interested_party:
Synopsys, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Synopsys, Inc. v. Lee et al
as 1:2017cv00517
Plaintiff:
Synopsys, Inc.
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Intervenor_defendant:
Mentor Graphics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Synopsys, Inc. v. Lee et al
as 1:2014cv00674
Plaintiff:
Synopsys, Inc.
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Mentor Graphics Corporation v. Rea
as 1:2013cv00518
Plaintiff:
Mentor Graphics Corporation
Defendant:
Teresa Stanek Rea
Intervenor_defendant:
Synopsys, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
IN RE RICOH CO., LTD.
as 11-1199
Defendant-Appellee:
AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Aeroflex Incorporated and others
Defendant-Appellant:
Ricoh Company, Ltd. and Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Synopsys, Inc. and Synopsys, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
