Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 70,453
Mendiola v. United States of America
as 24-3218
Petitioner: JUAN MANUEL MENDIOLA
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Juan Argueta-Portillo v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1886
Petitioner: JUAN ALEXANDER ARGUETA-PORTILLO
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Douse v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff: James Nathaniel Douse
Defendant: United States of America and Greylock McKinnon Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Moses
as 24-1341
Defendant: SOMORIE MOSES, Sugar Bear, Somorie Barfield and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1337
Defendant: WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jarmarco Moore v. USA
as 24-1869
Applicant: JARMARCO O. MOORE
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Haapaniemi
as 24-3161
Defendant: BJORN ERIK HAAPANIEMI, Peter Lee Norris and Peter Lee Bjorn Norris
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mi Familia Vota, et al. v. Petersen, et al.
as 24-3188
Plaintiff: MI FAMILIA VOTA, VOTO LATINO, LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA and others
Defendant: ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State, KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Intervenor: WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Saintillus v. United States of America
as 24-3167
Petitioner: CHALONER SAINTILLUS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Essenfeld
as 24-3185
Defendant: THEODORE E. ESSENFELD and Theordore E. Essenfeld
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?