Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Daniel Haldane, et al v. G. Hammond, et al
as 17-80197
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DANIEL HALDANE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, WENDEL JOHNSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, TIMOTHY MARTIN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Respondent:
G. STEVEN HAMMOND, Chief Medical Officer of the Washington Department of Corrections, in their official capacities and DAN PACHOLKE, Secretary of the Washington Department of Corrections, in their official capacities
Timothy Kendrick v. United State
as 16-2605
Petitioner:
Timothy Martin Kendrick
Respondent:
United States of America
Timothy Kendrick v. United State
as 14-1644
Petitioner:
Timothy Martin Kendrick
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Vincent Williams v. Chicago Public Schools, et al
as 12-2448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS, TIMOTHY MARTIN and PAUL H. SCHWENDENER, INCORPORATED
USA v. Timothy Gonzalez
as 11-50440
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY MARTIN GONZALEZ
Frilot L.L.C. v. McClantoc et al
as 1:2011mc00022
Plaintiff:
Frilot L.L.C.
Defendant:
Timothy Martin McClantoc and Core Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
MARTIN v. LINKAMERICA EXPRESS INC
as 1:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MARTIN
Defendant:
LINKAMERICA EXPRESS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bragg et al v. Martin et al
as 3:2005cv03259
Plaintiff:
James Bragg , Doug Downs , Gary Duitsman and others
Defendant:
Timothy Martin , Robert Millette , Brian Piersma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
