Cases 11 - 20 of 3,886
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-410
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
Louisiana v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 6:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, Warner Chilcott Sales U S L L C, Warner Chilcott, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Value Drug Company v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2022mc00066
Plaintiff:
VALUE DRUG COMPANY
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WATSON LABORATORIES INC and others
Petitioner:
Lars Taavola and Ken Cappel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
VICTORIA SPATARO et al v. VALUE DRUG COMPANY
as 2:2022cv06910
Petitioner:
VICTORIA SPATARO, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Respondent:
VALUE DRUG COMPANY
Interested Party:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL INC. and AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
VICTORIA SPATARO et al v. VALUE DRUG COMPANY
as 3:2022cv06910
Petitioner:
VICTORIA SPATARO, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Respondent:
VALUE DRUG COMPANY
Interested Party:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL INC. and AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
Value Drug Company v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2022mc23781
Plaintiff:
Value Drug Company
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals, U.S.A., Inc., Par Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Winston County, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 6:2022cv01394
Plaintiff:
Winston County, Alabama
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
