Other Statutes Cases filed in California
Cases 11 - 20 of 41
County of Alameda et al v. Richard S. Sackler et al
as 8:2019cv02154
Defendant: BEVERLY SACKLER, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: City of Oxnard, County of Alameda, City of Costa Mesa and others
Trustee: Trust for the Benefit of Members of the Raymond Sackler Family
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
In Re Glumetza Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv05822
Defendant: Lupin Ltd., Bausch Health Companies Inc., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., Rite Aid Corporation, Hy-Vee, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FWK Holdings, LLC v. Bausch Health Companies Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv05426
Defendant: Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Bausch Health Companies Inc., LUPIN LTD and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings, LLC
Petitioner: City of Providence, H-E-B LP, Albertsons Companies Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
County of Ventura v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv06799
Defendant: Specgx, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff: County of Ventura
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Tule River Indian Tribe of California v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03222
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: TULE RIVER INDIAN TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03224
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: LYTTON BAND OF POMO INDIANS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff: Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae: HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent: State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner: Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party: Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Feather River Tribal Health, Inc. v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 5:2019cv00823
Defendant: H. D. Smith, LLC d/b/a HD Smith, f/k/a H. D. Smith Wholesale Drug Co., BEVERLY SACKLER, ALLERGAN PLC F/K/A ACTAVIS PLC F/K/A ALLERGAN, INC. and others
Plaintiff: Feather River Tribal Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY INDIAN HEALTH, INC. v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 5:2019cv00005
Defendant: H. D. Smith, LLC d/b/a HD Smith, f/k/a H. D. Smith Wholesale Drug Co., McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY INDIAN HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of San Bernardino et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 5:2018cv01527
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: The People of The State of California and County of San Bernardino
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?