Cases 11 - 20 of 111
Doe (T.W.) v. JRD Partnership et al
as 3:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (T.W.)
Defendant:
JRD Partnership doing business as Motel 6, G6 Hospitality, LLC, G6 Hospitality Franchising, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Jane Doe v. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts et al
as CAC/8:23-CV-01554
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
Jane Doe v. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts et al
as 8:2023cv01554
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Patsiko, Inc. and Sunstone Anaheim Owner, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
T.S. v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. et al
as MN/0:23-CV-02530
Plaintiff:
T.S.
Defendant:
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc
Doe v. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts et al
as 2:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and T.R.S.
Defendant:
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, SKAVP Enterprises, LP, Vitarag Hospitality, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PS) Fletcher et al v. Baghri Hotels Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01444
Plaintiff:
Karen Fletcher and Howard Herships
Defendant:
Baghri Hotels Inc., Sunita Kapoor and Wyndham Hotels and Resorts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
TIMKO et al v. NSPA LOUNGE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01307
Defendant:
YADWINDER SINGH, BALJINDER KAUR, HIMANSHU BHATIA and others
Plaintiff:
TERRI TIMKO, ANTHONY ROBINSON and STEPHANIE DARNELL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
FLETCHER et al v. BAGHRI HOTELS INC et al
as 3:2023cv03411
Plaintiff:
Karen Fletcher and Howard Herships
Defendant:
BAGHRI HOTELS INC, SUNITA KAPOOR and WYNDHAM HOTELS AND RESORTS INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe (A.S.) v. Wyndham Hotel & Resorts, Inc.
as TXS/4:23-CV-01969
Plaintiff:
Doe (A.S.)
Defendant:
Wyndham Hotel & Resorts, Inc.
S.R. v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. et al
as OHS/2:23-CV-01731
Plaintiff:
S.R.
Defendant:
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
