Cases 21 - 30 of 40
MAG Aerospace Industries, Inc. v. B/E Aerospace, Inc.
as 2:2014mc00078
Plaintiff:
MAG Aerospace Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
B/E Aerospace, Inc.
Objector:
Alaska Airlines, Inc and Alaska Air Group, Inc.
Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation - Opt Out Cases
as 1:2014md01720
Defendant:
Affiliated Foods Midwest Cooperative, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Airtran Airways, Inc, Alaska Air Group, Inc., Alaska Airlines, Inc. and others
323) 931-4990 (fax:
Little Pub Holdings, LLC and Tavern Hospitality Group Holdings, LLC
Objector:
National Federation of Independent Businesses and Vicente Consulting LLC
In Re:
Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation - Opt Out Cases
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Alaska Air Group, Inc. et al v. Visa, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07175
Plaintiff:
Alaska Air Group, Inc., Alaska Airlines, Inc. and Horizon Air Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Visa, Inc., Visa U.S.A., Inc., Visa International Service Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
CEATS, Inc. v. Continental Airlines, Inc.
as 13-1529
Defendant / Appellee:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, LIVE NATION WORLDWIDE, INC., VIRGIN AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CEATS, INC.
Defendant:
AIRTRAN AIRWAYS, INC.
TQP Development, LLC v. Directv, Inc, et al
as 1:2012mc00105
Plaintiff:
TQP Development, LLC
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation, Expedia, Inc, Orbitz, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Azza Eid, et al v. USDC-NVL
as 11-73129
:
In re: AZZA EID, AMRE R. GINENA, NAHID I. GINENA and others
Petitioner:
AZZA EID, AMRE R. GINENA, NAHID I. GINENA and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.
US Airways, Inc., for American Airlines, Inc. as Successor and Real Party in Interest v. Sabre Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv02725
Plaintiff:
US Airways, Inc., for American Airlines, Inc. as Successor and Real Party in Interest
Petitioner:
Spirit Airlines, Inc., oneworld Management Company, Inc., Expedia, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Sabre Holdings Corporation, Sabre Inc., Sabre Travel International Limited and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Carlson Wagonlit Travel
Not Classified By Court:
Brussels Airlines N.V., Swiss International Air Lines Ltd. and Austrian Airlines AG
Interested Party:
Farelogix and Travelport L.P.
Amicus Curiae:
Air Canada, Alaska Airlines, Inc., Virgin America Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Expedite, Inc. v. Plus, Bags, Cars & Serv, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00329
Defendant:
Alaska Airlines Inc. and Plus, Bags, Cars & Serv, LLC
Plaintiff:
Expedite, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America et al v. American Express Company et al.
as 1:2010cv04496
Interested Party:
Individual Plaintiffs in 11-md-2221, Juniper Bank, All Plaintiffs in and others
Plaintiff:
State of Nebraska, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Not Classified By Court:
Citibank, N.A., Federal Express Corporation and FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.
Petitioner:
US Airways, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc, PayPal, Inc. and others
Defendant:
American Express Company, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa Inc. and others
Material Witne:
Jetblue Airways Corporation
Intervenor:
Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Alaska Airlines Inc v. Bradley Carey, et al
as 10-35575
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALASKA AIRLINES INC, an Alaska corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
BRADLEY CAREY, JANE DOE CAREY, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof and CAREY TRAVEL INC, a Washington corporation
Defendant-third-party-defendant - Appellee:
POINTS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
