Cases 21 - 30 of 371
Leon BrightIn re: Leon Bright
as 23-13749
Petitioner:
In re: LEON BRIGHT
Respondent:
CITY OF TAMPA, J. LAMBERT, CHRISTINA M. MITCHELL and others
Jibril Ibrahim v. Vizio, Inc.
as 23-1762
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIBRIL LUQMAN IBRAHIM
Defendant / Appellee:
VIZIO, INC., SELF STORAGE PLUS, HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Christopher White v. Devon Key
as 23-1683
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WHITE, an individual and CHRISTOPHER GLENN WHITE, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
DEVON KEY, an individual, ALLISON MAHER, a/k/a Marie Smith, an individual, TUCOWS, INC., a Pennsylvania Company and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Caleb Barnett, et al v. Kwame Raoul, et al
as 23-1825
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CALEB BARNETT, BRIAN NORMAN, HOOD'S GUNS & MORE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KWAME RAOUL, Attorney General of the State of Illinois and BRENDAN F. KELLY, Director of the Illinois State Police
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN FIREARMS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Kenneth Leaming v. USDC-WAWSE
as 23-70077
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING, MATTHEW SAMPSON, Fiduciary, et ux., V.A. Chief of Police doing business as Lt. J. Doe, et ux., VA Police, MICHAEL J. FRANKLIN, Director, Fiduciary, et ux., V.A. Police Service and others
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Jibril Ibrahim v. Vizio, Inc.
as 23-1188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIBRIL LUQMAN IBRAHIM
Defendant / Appellee:
VIZIO, INC., SELF STORAGE PLUS, HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae:
The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner:
Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
Devon Earl v. Brandon Harris, et al
as 23-1063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVON AUSTIN EARL, sui juris
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANDON HARRIS, Badge #2918, in his individual and official capacity as Police Officer of New Castle County Police Department, ALEXANDER PETERSON, in his individual and official capacity as Magistrate of Justice of the Peace Court No. 11, C. TEMPLE, Clerk (New Castle Clerk of the Peace) in her individual and official capacity as Clerk of New Castle County Justice of the Peace Courty No. 11 and others
Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe, et al v. Joseph Walsh
as 23-1257
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe, a federally recognized Indian tribe, Sara Rice, in her official capacity as Mille Lacs Band Chief of Police, Derrick Naumann, in his official capacity as Sergeant of the Mille Lacs Band Police Department and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph J. Walsh, individually and in his official capacity as County Attorney for Mille Lacs County
Defendant:
Kyle Burton, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Mille Lacs County and County of Mille Lacs, Minnesota
Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe, et al v. County of Mille Lacs, MN
as 23-1261
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe, a federally recognized Indian tribe, Sara Rice, in her official capacity as Mille Lacs Band Chief of Police, Derrick Naumann, in his official capacity as Sergeant of the Mille Lacs Band Police Department and others
Defendant / Appellant:
County of Mille Lacs, Minnesota
Defendant:
Joseph J. Walsh, individually and in his official capacity as County Attorney for Mille Lacs County and Kyle Burton, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Mille Lacs County
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
