Cases 21 - 30 of 144
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. City of Manchester, TN (PLR2)
as 4:2020cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Manchester, TN
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. City of Clarksville, Tennessee
as 3:2020cv00068
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Clarksville, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Sears v. Sears et al
as 3:2019cv00807
Defendant:
Carma Dennis McGee, Dr. Robert M. Wheatley, Elaine B. Beeler and others
Plaintiff:
Anne A. Sears
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Warford v. Memphis City Employees Credit Union
as 2:2019cv02403
Plaintiff:
Hazel Warford
Defendant:
Memphis City Employees Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Renfroe v. CDJR Knoxville, LLC d/b/a Secret City Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram (JRG1)
as 3:2019cv00092
Plaintiff:
Diane Renfroe
Defendant:
CDJR Knoxville, LLC d/b/a Secret City Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram
City of Memphis v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.
as 2:2019cv02158
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L.P.
Plaintiff:
City of Memphis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Memphis v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv02159
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Memphis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Taylor General Employees Retirement System v. Astec Industries, Inc. et al (PLR1)
as 1:2019cv00024
Defendant:
David C. Silvious, Benjamin G. Brock and Astec Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
City of Taylor General Employees Retirement System
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02654
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00374
Defendant:
City of Oak Ridge, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
