Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Knight First Amendment Institu v. United States Department of Ho We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-3837
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff / Appellee: Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University
Defendant / Appellant: United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States Department of State
Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02761
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Plaintiff: Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-1036
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Knight First Amendment Inst., et al v. CIA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5045
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of State, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University
Plaintiff / Appellant: Committee to Protect Journalists
Alasaad, et al v. Wolf, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1077
Plaintiff / Appellee: MATTHEW WRIGHT, NADIA ALASAAD, MOHAMMED AKRAM SHIBLY and others
Interested Party: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, R STREET INSTITUTE, CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS D. HOMAN, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, ELAINE DUKE, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in her official capacity and others
Alasaad, et al v. Wolf, et al
as 20-1081
Interested Party: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER, R STREET INSTITUTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEREMIE DUPIN, AARON GACH, NADIA ALASAAD and others
Defendant / Appellee: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity and MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity
Plaintiff: TECHFREEDOM
Defendant / Appellant: MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity and CHAD WOLF, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee: SUHAIB ALLABABIDI
Roskin-Frazee v. Columbia University
as 19-2713
Plaintiff / Appellant: Amelia Roskin-Frazee
Defendant / Appellee: Columbia University
Jane Doe 16 et al v. Columbia University et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01791
Defendant: Robert Hadden, Presbyterian Hospital Physician Services Organization, Inc., Trustees Of Columbia University in the City of New York and others
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 79, Jane Doe 16, Jane Doe 82 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NVLSP v. US
as 19-1081
Amicus Curiae: CALIFORNIA NEWS PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION, RADIO TELEVISION DIGITAL NEWS ASSOCIATION, JUDICATA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE and NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER
Defendant / Cross Appellant: UNITED STATES
Biswas v. Rouen
as 19-3452
Defendant / Appellee: Doron Nissim, Fabrizio Ferri, Suresh Nallareddy and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tuhin Kumar Biswas

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?