Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-5063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Lee v. Capital One Bank, et al
as 08-15858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. LEE, on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPITAL ONE BANK, a Virginia corporation and CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, INC., a Virginia corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Griffin et al v. Capital One Bank et al
as 8:2008cv00132
Plaintiff:
Arthur Griffin, Arthur Griffin, Arthur Griffin and others
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, Capital One Services, Inc., Capital One Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sylvester v. Northland Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01687
Plaintiff:
Randy Sylvester
Defendant:
Northland Group, Inc., Capital One Financial Corp. and Capital One Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lee v. Capital One Bank et al
as 3:2007cv04599
Plaintiff:
David J. Lee
Defendant:
Capital One Bank and Capital One Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv60875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
