Cases 21 - 30 of 279
Gerald BushIn re: Gerald Bush
as 23-2272
Petitioner:
In re: GERALD BUSH
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Goverment and RDA, PHILADELPHIA REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and JOHN M. YOUNGE
SILVERBERG v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC et al
as 2:2023cv01868
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., DOW, INC., CORTEVA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
RICHARDSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv01543
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE RICHARDSON
Defendant:
United States of America and City of Philadelphia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013cv07789
Not Classified By Court:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Keith Kornell, Gregory Galan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Nasser Bakizada, Robert Charles Class A, L.P., Jeffrey Sterk and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Citibank N.A., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Credit Suisse Group AP and others
Defendant:
Settling Defendants, Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Donna S. Lucas, Neil Taylor, Doris Sue Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Rives, Robert Miller, Casey Sterk and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC North America Holdings, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Fresno County Employees Retirement Association
Consolidated Counter Defendant:
BNP Paribas North America, Inc.
Claimant:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD), Forex Capital Markets, LLC, Lucid Markets LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH and MANAGING DIRECTOR TUMAR ALEXANDER
Intervenor Defendant:
Lift Every Voice Philly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
City of Philadelphia v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07040
Plaintiff:
City of Philadelphia
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lorraine Bond v. Office of the Attorney General, et al
as 22-5272
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lorraine Bond
Defendant / Appellee:
Office of the Attorney General, of the United States, Pennsylvania State Police Department, Office of the Mayor for the City of Philadelphia and others
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. MCKINSEY AND COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2022cv04004
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
MCKINSEY AND COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
