Cases 21 - 30 of 171
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
De Falco v. Cox Communications, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01014
Defendant:
Allied Universal Security Services, Regional Transportation Commission, American Medical Response and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gregg De Falco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jamal Parker v. State of Arizona, et al
as 21-16325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, Jamal El Trust, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cornelius v. Cox Communications, Inc
as 2:2021cv02108
Defendant:
Cox Communications, Inc
Plaintiff:
Dan Cornelius
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01066
Defendant:
Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02130
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
McNulty v. Cox Communications LA
as 20-30721
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ruth J. McNulty
Defendant / Appellee:
Cox Media Group, L.L.C. and Cox Communications Louisiana, L.L.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02733
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02248
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al v. RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
as 1:2019mc00029
Respondent:
Recording Industry Association of America
Petitioner:
CoxCom, LLC and Cox Communications, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
