Cases 21 - 30 of 63
MANZ TAIWAN LTD. et al v. DHL GLOBAL CUSTOMER LOGISTICS, INC.
as 2:2013cv00310
Plaintiff:
MANZ TAIWAN LTD. and SAGE ELECTROCHROMICS, INC.
Defendant:
DHL GLOBAL CUSTOMER LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
United States of America v. DHL Package, Bill #412146512
as 1:2012mc00715
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
DHL Package, Bill #412146512 and UPS Package, Trackig #1ZA26E660135744719
United States of America v. DHL Express (USA), Incorporate
as 12-3829
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Grupp and Robert Moll
Defendant - Appellee:
DHL Express (USA), Incorporated, DHL Worldwide Express, Incorporated and DHL Holdings (USA), Incorporated
United States of America v. DHL Parcel #33-1875-4832
as 1:2012mc00556
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
DHL Parcel #33-1875-4832
NLRB v. DHL Express, Inc.
as 12-1143
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
DHL Express, Inc.
United States of America v. A Tracking Device in the DHL Mail Parcel
as 1:2012mc00091
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
A Tracking Device in the DHL Mail Parcel
DHL Express, Inc. v. NLRB
as 12-1072
Petitioner:
DHL Express, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Semiconductor Components Industries LLC et al v. Air Express International Incorporated et al
as 2:2012cv00177
Plaintiff:
Semiconductor Components Industries LLC and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. MC21831
Defendant:
Air Express International Incorporated and DHL Global Forwarding B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierson et al v. Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc et al
as 5:2012cv10176
Plaintiff:
Randall Pierson , Nancy Londskroener , Lonzie Raymond and others
Defendant:
Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc, DHL Holdings USA, Inc., National Union Fire Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
