Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Rodriguez v. Harbetson et al
as 2:2011cv01601
Defendant:
Jack Harbetson, Sea-Search Armanda LP, Armada Company and others
Plaintiff:
Isidoro Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Fan v. Shulman
as 11-2012
Petitioner - Appellant:
LISHA FAN
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Kaufman, et al v. Shulman
as 11-2022
Petitioner - Appellant:
GORDAN KAUFMAN and LORNA KAUFMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Kaufman, et al v. Shulman
as 11-2017
Petitioner - Appellee:
GORDAN KAUFMAN and LORNA KAUFMAN
Respondent - Appellant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Haag v. Shulman
as 11-1979
Petitioner - Appellant:
KATHLEEN HAAG
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Virgil Liptak v. Internal Revenue Service, et al
as 11-8007
Petitioner:
Virgil F. Liptak
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, United States and/or Commissioner, Douglas Shulman, Department of Justice, Public Legal Education Associates, LC, c/o Eric Holder Jr. (US Attorney General), Does, Other Known and Unknown State and Federal Agents and others
Earls v. Justis et al
as 2:2011cv00887
Defendant:
Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr, Robert S Mueller, III, Christine M Owens and others
Plaintiff:
James R Earls
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
West v. Shulman
as 11-1008
Petitioner:
DAVID WEST
Respondent:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Komessar v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv07583
Petitioner:
Mark Komessar
Respondent:
United States of America , Douglas Shulman and P. J. Chyler
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Britton, et al v. Shulman
as 10-1951
Petitioner - Appellant:
CAROLYN P. BRITTON
Petitioner:
MEDICAL PRACTICE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
