Cases 21 - 30 of 96
Keith Dean Bradt et al v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv07752
Plaintiff:
CLYDE STENSRUD, BRENDA DAVIS, DIANE ULTICAN and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc., SoftBank Group Corp., Sprint Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
La Clinica De La Raza et al v. Trump et al
as 4:2019cv04980
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Maternal and Child Health Access, Central American Resource Center, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), MinKwon Center for Community Action and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv04975
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Maine, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), Women Lawyers on Guard Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, Center for Public Representation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Melanie Damian v. ICCXP International Council of Commodities Exchange Professionals, LLC, et al
as 2:2019cv05565
Defendant:
Patricia Tessandori Clancy and ICCXP International Council of Commodities Exchange Professionals, LLC,
Plaintiff:
Melanie E. Damian
Not Yet Classified:
Hunter Wise Commodites, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melanie E. Damian v. AU Resource, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05567
Plaintiff:
Melanie E. Damian
Defendant:
David Schneider and AU Resource, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
Hunter Wise Commodities, LLC, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Louis Whitehead v. Netflix Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05500
Defendant:
MGM INC, JP Morgan, UNNAMED DEWAYNE WICKHAM and others
Plaintiff:
David Louis Whitehead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re United States' Motion to Terminate Legacy Antitrust Judgments and Memorandum in Support Thereof
as 3:2019mc80147
Defendant:
Alameda Cty. Veterinary Med. Ass'n,, Domtar Inc., et al.,, Standard Oil Co. of Cal. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
In Re:
Termination of Legacy Antitrust Judgments in the Northern District of California
David P. Leibowitz v. MVP Home Solutions, LLC et al.
as 2:2019mc00058
Plaintiff:
David P. Leibowitz
Defendant:
MVP Home Solutions, LLC et al., MVP Home Solutions, LLC, Desslaines Sealy and others
Not Yet Classified:
SM Financial Services Corporation and Ada E. Quezada and Moises Quezada
In re Item 05 HP Personal Media Drive, et al
as 5:2019cv00107
Petitioner:
Terry L. Meisinger, Terry Lynn Meisinger and Terrill Lynn Meisinger
Respondent:
United States of America
In Re:
Item 05 HP Personal Media Drive, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
