Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Boyd County, et al v. Merscorp, Inc., et al
as 14-5647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOYD COUNTY, ex rel Phillip Hedrick as County Attorney, BREATHITT COUNTY, ex rel Brendon Miller as County Attorney, CARTER COUNTY, ex rel Patrick Flannery as County Attorney and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MERSCORP, INC., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC., MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carroll et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-18495
Plaintiff:
Patsy Carroll and Estil Carroll
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
USA v. Quentin Estill, et al
as 12-4423
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
QUENTIN ESTILL
USA v. Steven Estill
as 12-40108
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN DELANE ESTILL
Anthony Carter v. FLRA
as 11-2260
Petitioner:
ANTHONY CARTER
Respondent:
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Federal Correctional Institution, Estill, South Carolina
Touchstone Group, LLC v. Rink et al
as 1:2011cv02971
Plaintiff:
Touchstone Group, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel J. Rink, Tatum, LLC, SFN Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ohio Health Corporation v. Kimbler et al
as 2:2009cv00128
Defendant:
David L Kimbler, Estille Kimbler and Richard M Kimbler
Plaintiff:
Ohio Health Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Long Construction Company v. Estil Stiltner
as 09-1948
Petitioner:
LONG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Respondent:
ESTIL STILTNER and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
William Bonner v. M. Rivera
as 08-6709
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM LAMAR BONNER, a/k/a William Bonner
Respondent - Appellee:
M. L. RIVERA, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Estill
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
