Cases 21 - 30 of 71
S.L. et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as MOE/4:12-cv-00420
Plaintiff:
S. L. , E. B. , N. B. and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
IN RE: FCC 11-161
as 11-9900
Petitioner:
DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS CEDAR VALLEY, LLC, a Utah limited liablility company, TOTAH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., an Oklahoma corporation, H & B COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Kansas Corporation and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Direct Comm. Cedar Valley, et al v. FCC
as 11-9581
Petitioner:
DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS CEDAR VALLEY, LLC, a Utah limited liablility company, TOTAH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., an Oklahoma corporation, H & B COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Kansas Corporation and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
First National Bank of Georgia v. Stone et al
as 1:2010cv01053
Plaintiff:
First National Bank of Georgia , W. Galen Hobbs, Jr. and H. B. Lipham, III
Defendant:
Robert J. Stone , William A. Johnson , Randy Simpkins and others
Counter_claimant:
Robert J. Stone and William A. Johnson
Counter_defendant:
W. Galen Hobbs, Jr. and H. B. Lipham, III
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Wilson, et al v. Romer, et al
as 1:1992cv01470
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bradley , Willie Guyton , Woody Harrison and others
Defendant:
Roy Romer , Aristedes Zavaras , Lou Hesse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Julian Rochester v. State of South Carolina
as 10-6050
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, RICHLAND COUNTY JUDICIAL CENTER, JEAN H. TOAL and others
HOSTAK v. H. B. FULLER COMPANY
as PAE/2:09-CV-93920
Defendant:
H. B. FULLER COMPANY
Plaintiff:
HOSTAK
DAVIDSON v. H. B. FULLER COMPANY
as PAE/2:09-CV-93912
Defendant:
H. B. FULLER COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DAVIDSON
BEINART v. H. B. FULLER COMPANY
as PAE/2:09-CV-93902
Plaintiff:
BEINART
Defendant:
H. B. FULLER COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
