Cases 21 - 30 of 98
DIRAUF et al v. BERGER et al
as 2:2020cv05601
Plaintiff:
ANNY HANISCH, WALTER SCHMIDT, LUDWIG DIRAUF and others
Defendant:
MACARTHUR PLAZA, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INDUSTRIAL AVENUE INVESTORS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, CARLSTADT BUILDING ASSOCIATES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Ali v. Hazelwood
as 20-1414
Petitioner / Appellant:
TYREN ALI
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT HAZELWOOD, Warden, FCI - Berlin
Terence Sasaki v. Mark Inch, et al
as 19-16519
Defendant / Appellee:
DUTTON, C/O, FSL - Elkton, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY CLERK(S), NERO, SCHMIDT, CSO, FSL - Elkton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERENCE SASAKI
In re: James Hazelwood
as 17-5487
Movant:
In re: JAMES RONALD HAZELWOOD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wright Transportation, Inc. v. Pilot Corporation, et al
as 15-15184
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WRIGHT TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
PILOT CORPORATION, PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS, LLC, d.b.a. Pilot Flying J, JAMES A. HASLAM, III and others
:
MARK HAZELWOOD
Automotive Constant Velocity Joint Boot Products - Dealership Actions
as 2:2014cv02902
Plaintiff:
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Hammett Motor Company, Inc. and others
Defendant:
TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD. and TOYO AUTOMOTIVE PARTS (USA), INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Inverters - Dealership Actions
as 2:2013cv01802
Plaintiff:
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Hammett Motor Company, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd., Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc., Denso Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. et al v. TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD. et al
as 2:2014cv14719
Plaintiff:
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Hammett Motor Company, Inc. and others
Defendant:
TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD. and TOYO AUTOMOTIVE PARTS (USA), INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
