Cases 21 - 30 of 57,730
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3765
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, A.R.W., by and through his father Kurt Benshoof, NATHAN CLIBER and others
Gossett v. Bennett
as 24-3788
Petitioner:
MARK J. GOSSETT
Respondent:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Lopez v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Carlos J. Lopez
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Lorry C. Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COLEY v. WOZNIAK et al
as 2:2024cv02685
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. COLEY
Defendant:
JOSHUA WOZNIAK, CORTY SMITH and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Woolley v. O'Malley
as 24-3745
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WILLIAM WOOLLEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Calderon Lopez v. US
as 24-1947
Plaintiff:
RICARDO J. CALDERON LOPEZ, dba Starlight Consulting Services
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Santos v. Annikos, et al.
as 24-3730
Plaintiff:
RONALD R. SANTOS
Defendant:
KENNETH ANNIKOS, JOSEPH BENSON, N. BRITENBACK and others
U.S. Bank National Association v. O'Hara
as 24-1595
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the LXS 200612N
Defendant:
EDWARD J. O'HARA, FRANCIS O'HARA, Francis G. O'Hara, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Internal Revenue Service and others
MIKOLAJCZYK et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND P. MIKOLAJCZYK, PATRICIA J. WAGNER MIKOLAJCZYK and RICHARD L. WAGNER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
OTIS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
RYAN J. OTIS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
