Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Dupree v. Neos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Neos Therapeutics, Inc., Beth Hecht, Greg Robitaille and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dupree
Cisneros v. Urovant Sciences Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00735
Defendant:
James Hindman, Pierre Legault, MYRTLE POTTER and others
Plaintiff:
Claudia Cisneros
Wang v. Neos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Defendant:
Neos Therapeutics, Inc., Beth Hecht, Greg Robitaille and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
McGaugh v. Griffin
as 20-11268
Defendant / Appellee:
Nicholas Graham, Matt Coates, Dylan Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. McGaugh
Allen Robinson v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 20-16662
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALLEN JAMES ROBINSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Robinson v. Nat'l. Student Clearinghouse
as 20-1783
Interested Party:
PAUL CAMARENA
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL STUDENT CLEARINGHOUSE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES ROBINSON, MD and JAMES ROBINSON
United States of America v. White (Howard)
as 20-2051
Defendant:
Roy Robinson, AKA Mob, Allen Knight, AKA Stutter, Joey Colon and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Howard, AKA JuJu
Timothy Connell v. Warden, et al
as 20-11925
Defendant / Appellee:
VICTORIES, Nurse, WARDEN, GASKIN, Correctional Officer, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY ALAN CONNELL
James Robinson v. Carla Hacker-Agnew, et al
as 20-15979
Respondent / Appellee:
CARLA HACKER-AGNEW, Warden, Arizona State Prison Complex-Yuma and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, for State of Arizona
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES ROBINSON
United States of America v. White
as 20-805
Defendant:
Roy Robinson, AKA Mob, Allen Knight, AKA Stutter, Joey Colon and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael White, AKA Mike
Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
