Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Hoefgen v. Smith et al
as 4:2014cv02195
Plaintiff:
Samuel R Hoefgen
Defendant:
Alan Smith , John Campbell, Jr , Donald Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-24799
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Campbell and John Campbell
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Dennis Campbell, et al v. FBI
as 13-3717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL and MINDY JAYE ZIED-CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Campbell v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:13-dp-20865
Plaintiff:
John Campbell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Campbell v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as FLS/9:13-cv-80688
Plaintiff:
John Campbell
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
CAMPBELL v. LAW OFFICE OF CURTIS O. BARNES, PC
as 2:2012cv01566
Plaintiff:
JOHN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF CURTIS O. BARNES, PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WILSON v. GEITHNER et al
as 1:2012cv01605
Plaintiff:
FRANK H. WILSON
Defendant:
TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, JOHN BOEHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Campbell et al v. United States Department of Interior of et al
as 2:2012cv00115
Plaintiff:
Walter Campbell and John Campbell
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior , Bureau of Indian Affairs , Kenneth L. Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
In re: In Re: Dennis John Campbell
as 10-2560
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL
Defendant - Respondent:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
WILLIAM J NEALON and PAUL S DIAMOND
Espinoza-Martinez v. Campbell
as 2:2010cv00032
Defendant:
Warden John Campbell
Plaintiff:
Jesus Espinoza-Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
