Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 432
Zhang v. Garland
as 23-220
Petitioner: JIAN ZHANG
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
US v. Jian-Yun Dong
as 22-7456
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: JIAN-YUN DONG, a/k/a John Dong
Chen v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv06177
Plaintiff: Jian Fa Chen
Defendant: US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas and Patricia A. Menges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Wang v. Garland
as 22-1407
Petitioner: JIAN WANG
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dai v. Garland
as 22-6131
Petitioner: SU JUAN DAI and JIAN CE YE
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Maso Capital Investments v. E-House (China) Holdings
as 22-355
Plaintiff / Appellant: Maso Capital Investments Limited, Altimeo Asset Management, Blackwell Partners LLC Series A and others
Defendant / Appellee: E-House (China) Holdings Limited, Xin Zhou, Neil Nanpeng Shen and others
Xiu Jian Sun v. R. Lawrence, et al
as 22-5024
Plaintiff / Appellee: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Plaintiff / Appellant: Xiu Jian Sun, The Spiritual Adam
Defendant / Appellee: R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant United States, Joshua Lynn Rogers, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Fred E. Haynes, Assistant U.S. Attorney and others
Foran v. Ideanomics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff: Mark Foran
Defendant: Ideanomics, Inc., Shane McMahon, Alfred Poor and others
Jian Zhou v. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv09914
Plaintiff: Jian Zhou
Defendant: Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. f/k/a Property Solutions Acquisition Corp., Carsten Breitfeld, Zvi Glasman and others
Saee v. Ideanomics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10462
Plaintiff: Ali Saee
Defendant: Ideanomics, Inc., Shane McMahon, Alf Poor and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?