Cases 21 - 30 of 104
Bell v. Baker, et al
as 19-2259
Defendant / Appellee:
ROYCE WEST, LEONARD BELL, Pastor, JAMES BAKER, Paymaster and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SYLVANIUS BELL
Defendant:
JAMES WINTERS and PIA HAYNES WILLIAMS
Jeffrey Lazar v. Jennifer Knight, et al
as 19-4239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY LAZAR
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK KING, JR., Sergeant, JANE DOE, KENNETH KUEBLER, Deputy Chief and others
USA v. Rufus King, Jr., et al
as 19-14700
Defendant / Appellant:
RUFUS LEE KING, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Rufus King, Jr.
as 19-14699
Defendant / Appellant:
RUFUS LEE KING, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sheila Armstrong v. MI Bureau of Serv for Blind, et al
as 19-2179
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN KING, JR., JAMES HULL, EDWARD ROGERS, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHEILA ARMSTRONG
Karth v. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 19-1964
Defendant / Appellee:
KERYX BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC., GREGORY P. MADISON, JAMES OLIVIERO and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. ERICKSON, ABRAHAM KISWANI, JACKSON TERRELL, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIM KARTH
Interested Party:
MARNA IZZO and MIKE IZZO
Jacqueline Du Bois v. Martin Luther King, Jr. Family
as 19-11086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACQUELINE DU BOIS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. FAMILY CLINIC, INCORPORATED, doing business as Foremost Family Heatlh Centers
American Bar Association, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 19-5213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jamie B. Rudert and American Bar Association
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Kate A. Voigt, Geoffrey T. Burkhart and Michelle D. Quintero-Millan
Defendant / Appellee:
John B. King, Jr. and United States Department of Education
KING v. B&P REALTY HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2019cv02995
Plaintiff:
FRANK KING, JR.
Defendant:
B&P REALTY HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 9607
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
