Cases 21 - 30 of 78
USA v. Matthew Bawkey
as 21-1558
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES BAWKEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Matthew Dury
as 20-7897
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES DURY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Matthew Smith, et al v. Tumalo Irrigation District, et al
as 20-36057
Appellant:
ANN CORKERY, KEVIN CORKERY, PAUL CALLEN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD ALVARADO, in his official capacity as State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture and NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Counter Claimant:
TUMALO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv13152
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601
Matthew Griffin v. CoreCivic, et al
as 20-17177
Defendant / Appellee:
CORECIVIC, a Maryland Corporation, R. ACUNA, Captain - Previously named as Doe 1 and Unknown Acuna, WILLIAM PINKERTON, Correctional Officer - Previously named as: Doe 6 and Unknown Pinkerton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN
Matthew Leachman v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
as 20-20323
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES LEACHMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
US v. Matthew Dury
as 20-6718
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES DURY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Matthew Dury v. J. Ciufo
as 20-15673
Defendant / Appellee:
J. CIUFO, Unit Manager
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES DURY
Matthew Horner v. Jeffery Nines
as 20-6426
Petitioner:
MATTHEW JAMES HORNER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden and JEFFERY NINES, Acting Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
