Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,730
Cunningham v. Lupis
as 24-844
Plaintiff: JAMES E. CUNNINGHAM, SR.
Defendant: FRANCESCO LUPIS, Dr., COLLEEN GALLAGHER, RUDY ALVAREZ and others
Hartman v. First Bank, et al.
as 4:2024cv00285
Plaintiff: Monica Hartman
Defendant: Southern Hills Property Group
Garnishee: First Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Curtis, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1869
Plaintiff: AILA CURTIS, CIERA AGEE, ALISON ARCHER and others
Defendant: JAY ROBERT INSLEE, PEACEHEALTH, LIZ DUNNE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60502
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00491
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Badilla Meza v. Nunez Reyes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00542
Petitioner: Richard Pedro Badilla Meza
Defendant: Monica Enisse Nunez Reyes
Respondent: Monica Denisse Nunez Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff: SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Mellado-Alvizures, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1620
Petitioner: MONICA ESMERAKLA MELLADO-ALVIZURES and ROSMERY MIRTALA CARRILLO-MELLADO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Aguinda-Alvarado v. Garland
as 24-658
Petitioner: NIXON OMAR AGUINDA-ALVARADO, MONICA PATRICIA ORTEGA-PACA and RIHANNA HAYDE AGUINDA-ORTEGA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cavallari v. Cavallari-Montenegro
as 2:2024cv10609
Petitioner: Jacopo Cavallari
Respondent: Monica Alejandra Cavallari-Montenegro

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?