Cases 21 - 30 of 2,205
United States of America v. Brown
as 24-2688
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NATHAN CODY BROWN
Jayaton-Kerry v. Cooper, et al.
as 24-2582
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JAYATON-KERRY, Third Party Intervenor/Injured party re Mary Alice Nelson-Rogers Trust
Defendant:
JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff, KANDICE LEON, Deputy Superior Court Clerk, LEE SEALE, Superior Court Clerk and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WHITE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
NATHAN D. WHITE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-1958
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FREYA BRIER, MOSHE ADMON, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner:
NATHAN HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
Laura Baldwin v. Joshua Devine, et al
as 24-1510
Plaintiff:
Laura Marie Baldwin
Defendant:
Joshua C. Devine, Individually, doing business as Circuit Judge, Callaway County 13th Circuit Court, Kevin M.J. Crane, Individually, doing business as Circuit Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
